GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1070 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
119 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1070 . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1070
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1070 | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
GPU Name | GP104 (GP104-200-A1) | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
Fab Process | 16 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 314 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
Transistors | 7,200 million | vs | 260 million |
Shaders | 1920 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 15 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 1506 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 120 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1070 | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 2002 MHz
8008 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1070 | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
TDP | 150 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 10 Jun 2016 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GeForce GTX 1070
96.40 GP/s
GeForce 210
2.08 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070
180.70 GT/s
GeForce 210
4.16 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070
256.30 GB/s
GeForce 210
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070
5783.00 GFLOPs
GeForce 210
39.36 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better