GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon HD 6870
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
51 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6870 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6870 |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|
GPU Name | TU116 () | vs | Barts (Barts XT) |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 255 mm² |
Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 1,700 million |
Shaders | 1280 | vs | 1120 |
Compute Units | 20 | vs | 14 |
Core clock | 1530 MHz | vs | 900 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | 1050 MHz
4200 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|
TDP | 100 watts | vs | 151 watts |
Release Date | 22 Nov 2019 | vs | 21 Oct 2010 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
55.20 GP/s
Radeon HD 6870
28.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
138.00 GT/s
Radeon HD 6870
50.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 6870
134.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6870
2016.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better