GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 Graphics IGP |
85 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER . |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R5 Graphics IGP | |
---|
GPU Name | TU116 () | vs | Mullins () |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | unknown |
Shaders | 1280 | vs | 128 |
Compute Units | 20 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 1530 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R5 Graphics IGP | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R5 Graphics IGP | |
---|
TDP | 100 watts | vs | 15 watts |
Release Date | 22 Nov 2019 | vs | 14 Jun 2014 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
55.20 GP/s
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
3.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
138.00 GT/s
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
6.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192.00 GB/s
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
204.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better