GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390X
Summary
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
100%
Radeon R9 390X
99%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
| 175 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 390X . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 390X |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (13 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 () | vs | Grenada (Grenada XT) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 438 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 6,200 million |
| Shaders | 1280 | vs | 2816 |
| Compute Units | 20 | vs | 44 |
| Core clock | 1530 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 176 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 512 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| TDP | 100 watts | vs | 275 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Nov 2019 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
55.20 GP/s
Radeon R9 390X
67.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
138.00 GT/s
Radeon R9 390X
184.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 390X
384.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 390X
5914.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
70
Radeon R9 390X
75
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
57
Radeon R9 390X
80
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
39
Radeon R9 390X
35
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
66
Radeon R9 390X
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
53
Radeon R9 390X
56
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
49
Radeon R9 390X
59
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
31
Radeon R9 390X
29
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
42
Radeon R9 390X
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
28
Radeon R9 390X
33
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
27
Radeon R9 390X
33
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
16
Radeon R9 390X
19
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
18
Radeon R9 390X
20
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
32
Radeon R9 390X
-1
FPS (higher is better)