GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Summary
GeForce GTX 1650
104%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (10 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | GK110B (GK110-425-B1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 561 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 7,080 million |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 2880 |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 15 |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 875 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 240 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | vs | 1750 MHz
7000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 7 Nov 2013 |
GeForce GTX 1650
53.28 GP/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
52.50 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
210.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
336.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
5040.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1650
77
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
74
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
22
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
25
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650
42
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
31
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
54
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
61
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1650
51
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
43
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1650
49
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
17
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
19
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650
27
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
21
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
39
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
45
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1650
35
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
32
FPS (higher is better)