GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 950M
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 950M |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | GM107 (N16P-GT) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 148 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,870 million |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 640 |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 13 Mar 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1650
53.28 GP/s
GeForce GTX 950M
15.89 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
GeForce GTX 950M
39.70 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 950M
28.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 950M
1271.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better