GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Summary
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
264%
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
| 164% higher gaming performance. |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB |
| 45 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (13 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 (TU116-400-A1) | vs | GP107 (GP107-301-A1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 14 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 132 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 3,300 million |
| Shaders | 1536 | vs | 768 |
| Compute Units | 24 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 1500 MHz | vs | 1392 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | vs | 24 |
| TMUs | 96 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 96 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | 1752 MHz
7008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | |
|---|
| TDP | 120 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Feb 2019 | vs | 21 May 2018 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
84.96 GP/s
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
36.43 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
169.90 GT/s
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
72.86 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
288.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
84.10 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5437.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
2332.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
108
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
85
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
97
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
40
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
124
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
62
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
80
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
26
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
78
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
32
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
56
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
22
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
70
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
27
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
94
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
41
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
56
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
18
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
64
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
37
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
13
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
34
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
9
FPS (higher is better)