GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) | |
---|
GPU Name | TU116 (TU116-400-A1) | vs | Ivy Bridge GT1 () |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 392 million |
Shaders | 1536 | vs | 6 |
Compute Units | 24 | vs | 0 |
Core clock | 1500 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
ROPs | 48 | vs | 1 |
TMUs | 96 | vs | 1 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) | |
---|
TDP | 120 watts | vs | 0 watts |
Release Date | 22 Feb 2019 | vs | 1 Apr 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better