GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon R9 Nano
Summary
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
138%
Radeon R9 Nano
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
| 38% higher gaming performance. |
| 55 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 Nano . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 Nano |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (27 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 (TU116-400-A1) | vs | Fiji (Fiji XT CA) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 8,900 million |
| Shaders | 1536 | vs | 4096 |
| Compute Units | 24 | vs | 64 |
| Core clock | 1500 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 4096 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|
| TDP | 120 watts | vs | 175 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Feb 2019 | vs | 27 Aug 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
84.96 GP/s
Radeon R9 Nano
64.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
169.90 GT/s
Radeon R9 Nano
256.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
288.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 Nano
512.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5437.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 Nano
8192.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
91
Radeon R9 Nano
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
90
Radeon R9 Nano
64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
108
Radeon R9 Nano
72
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
85
Radeon R9 Nano
78
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
124
Radeon R9 Nano
90
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
80
Radeon R9 Nano
55
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
81
Radeon R9 Nano
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
102
Radeon R9 Nano
93
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
91
Radeon R9 Nano
58
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
69
Radeon R9 Nano
37
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
69
Radeon R9 Nano
51
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
78
Radeon R9 Nano
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
56
Radeon R9 Nano
51
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
94
Radeon R9 Nano
68
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
56
Radeon R9 Nano
39
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
52
Radeon R9 Nano
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
73
Radeon R9 Nano
69
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
64
Radeon R9 Nano
47
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
37
Radeon R9 Nano
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
40
Radeon R9 Nano
31
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
43
Radeon R9 Nano
32
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
28
Radeon R9 Nano
26
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
47
Radeon R9 Nano
36
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
33
Radeon R9 Nano
21
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
26
Radeon R9 Nano
16
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
41
Radeon R9 Nano
45
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
34
Radeon R9 Nano
27
FPS (higher is better)