GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs GeForce GT 610
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 610 |
190 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | | GeForce GT 610 | |
---|
GPU Name | GT200B (G200-105-B3) | vs | GF119 (GF119-300-A1) |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 79 mm² |
Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 292 million |
Shaders | 240 | vs | 48 |
Compute Units | 10 | vs | 1 |
Core clock | 633 MHz | vs | 810 MHz |
ROPs | 28 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | | GeForce GT 610 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 448 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective | vs | 898 MHz
1796 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 896 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | | GeForce GT 610 | |
---|
TDP | 219 watts | vs | 29 watts |
Release Date | 16 Feb 2010 | vs | 2 Apr 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better