GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 6530
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6530 |
| 180 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 275
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 275 | | Radeon HD 6530 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT200B (G200-105-B3) | vs | Redwood (Redwood PRO) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 104 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 627 million |
| Shaders | 240 | vs | 400 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 633 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 28 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 275 | | Radeon HD 6530 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 448 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective | vs | 600 MHz
1200 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 896 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 275 | | Radeon HD 6530 | |
|---|
| TDP | 219 watts | vs | 39 watts |
| Release Date | 15 Jan 2009 | vs | 14 May 2011 |
GeForce GTX 275
17.70 GP/s
Radeon HD 6530
5.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 275
50.60 GT/s
Radeon HD 6530
13.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 275
127.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 6530
19.20 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 275
673.90 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6530
520.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better