GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs GeForce 210 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 OEM |
| 173 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce 210 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT200B (G200-350-B3) | vs | GT216 () |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 100 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 486 million |
| Shaders | 240 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 648 MHz | vs | 475 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce 210 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 512 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce 210 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 204 watts | vs | 31 watts |
| Release Date | 15 Jan 2009 | vs | 4 Sep 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better