GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 720 384SP
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 720 384SP |
| 185 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce GT 720 384SP | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT200B (G200-350-B3) | vs | GK208 () |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 87 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 240 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 648 MHz | vs | 967 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce GT 720 384SP | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 512 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce GT 720 384SP | |
|---|
| TDP | 204 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 15 Jan 2009 | vs | 27 Mar 2014 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better