GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition |
| Around 39% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 450 |
| 98 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
The GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT200B (G200-350-B3) | vs | GF106 (GF106-250-KA-A1) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 238 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 1,170 million |
| Shaders | 240 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 4 |
| Core clock | 648 MHz | vs | 783 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 512 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective | vs | 902 MHz
3608 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | | GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|
| TDP | 204 watts | vs | 106 watts |
| Release Date | 15 Jan 2009 | vs | 13 Sep 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)