GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GT 645 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 645 OEM |
| 102 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 645 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 | | GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT200B (G200-350-B3) | vs | GF114 () |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 332 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 1,950 million |
| Shaders | 240 | vs | 288 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 648 MHz | vs | 776 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 24 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 | | GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 512 bit | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective | vs | 957 MHz
3828 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 285 | | GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 204 watts | vs | 102 watts |
| Release Date | 23 Dec 2008 | vs | 24 Apr 2012 |
GeForce GTX 285
20.70 GP/s
GeForce GT 645 OEM
9.31 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 285
51.80 GT/s
GeForce GT 645 OEM
37.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 285
159.00 GB/s
GeForce GT 645 OEM
91.90 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 285
708.50 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 645 OEM
894.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better