GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTS 150 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 150 OEM |
63 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 285
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 | | GeForce GTS 150 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | GT200B (G200-350-B3) | vs | G92 () |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 65 nm |
Die Size | 470 mm² | vs | 324 mm² |
Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 754 million |
Shaders | 240 | vs | 128 |
Compute Units | 10 | vs | 8 |
Core clock | 648 MHz | vs | 738 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 285 | | GeForce GTS 150 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 512 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 285 | | GeForce GTS 150 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 204 watts | vs | 141 watts |
Release Date | 23 Dec 2008 | vs | 10 Mar 2009 |
GeForce GTX 285
20.70 GP/s
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
11.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 285
51.80 GT/s
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
47.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 285
159.00 GB/s
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 285
708.50 GFLOPs
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
470.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better