HWBench.com

    GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM

    GeForce GTX 295
    Memory: 896Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
    Release date: 8 Jan 2009
    GeForce GTX 295
    GeForce GTX 760 OEM
    Memory: 1536Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
    Release date: 27 Jun 2013
    GeForce GTX 760 OEM
    You are comparing OEM or variant versions of at least one VGA. Did you mean GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 760 instead?

    Summary

    Synthetic performance index

    • GeForce GTX 295
      100%
    • GeForce GTX 760 OEM
      193%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 295

    Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
    PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

    Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760 OEM

    159 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 295 .
    This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
    Around 93% higher average synthetic performance.
    Supports PhysX
    Supports G-Sync
    Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
    Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications
    GeForce GTX 760 OEM

    HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 760 OEM

    The GeForce GTX 760 OEM is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).

    Specifications

    Core Configuration

    GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 760 OEM
    GPU NameGT200B (G200-400-B3)vsGK104 ()
    Fab Process55 nmvs28 nm
    Die Size470 mm²vs294 mm²
    Transistors1,400 millionvs3,540 million
    Shaders240vs1152
    Compute Units10vs6
    Core clock576 MHzvs823 MHz
    ROPs28vs24
    TMUs80vs96

    Memory Configuration

    GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 760 OEM
    Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR5
    Bus Width448 bit x2vs192 bit
    Memory Speed999 MHz
    1998 MHz effective    		vs1400 MHz
    5600 MHz effective
    Memory Size896 Mbvs1536 Mb

    Additional details

    GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 760 OEM
    TDP289 wattsvs130 watts
    Release Date8 Jan 2009vs27 Jun 2013

    Raw Performance comparison

    Pixel Rate

    • GeForce GTX 295
      32.20 GP/s
    • GeForce GTX 760 OEM
      19.80 GP/s

    GigaPixels - higher is better

    Texel Rate

    • GeForce GTX 295
      92.20 GT/s
    • GeForce GTX 760 OEM
      79.00 GT/s

    GigaTexels - higher is better

    Memory bandwidth

    • GeForce GTX 295
      224.00 GB/s
    • GeForce GTX 760 OEM
      134.00 GB/s

    GB/s - higher is better

    Single precision performance

    • GeForce GTX 295
      1192.40 GFLOPs
    • GeForce GTX 760 OEM
      1896.00 GFLOPs

    GFLOPs - higher is better

    Synthetic benchmarks

    3DMark 11

    • GeForce GTX 295
      4440
    • GeForce GTX 760 OEM
      8600

    Points (higher is better)

    Similar comparisons

    GeForce GTX 295VS GeForce GT 730 GDDR5
    GeForce GTX 295GeForce GT 730 GDDR5
    GeForce GTX 295VS Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7850K)
    GeForce GTX 295Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7850K)
    GeForce GTX 760 OEMVS Radeon RX 550
    GeForce GTX 760 OEMRadeon RX 550
    GeForce GTX 760 OEMVS Radeon R9 370X
    GeForce GTX 760 OEMRadeon R9 370X
    Radeon RX 560XVS Radeon RX 560D
    Radeon RX 560XRadeon RX 560D
    Radeon RX 560DVS Radeon RX 560
    Radeon RX 560DRadeon RX 560