GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R7 240
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 240 |
| 130 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 460 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 460
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 460 | | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1) | vs | Oland (Oland PRO) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 332 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,950 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 336 | vs | 320 |
| Compute Units | 7 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 675 MHz | vs | 730 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 460 | | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 460 | | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|
| TDP | 160 watts | vs | 30 watts |
| Release Date | 12 Jul 2010 | vs | 8 Oct 2013 |
GeForce GTX 460
9.45 GP/s
Radeon R7 240
5.84 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
37.80 GT/s
Radeon R7 240
14.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
115.00 GB/s
Radeon R7 240
28.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
907.20 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 240
467.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better