GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon R7 265
Summary
GeForce GTX 460
100%
Radeon R7 265
195%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460 |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 265 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Around 95% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 265
The Radeon R7 265 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 460 | | Radeon R7 265 | |
---|
GPU Name | GF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1) | vs | Pitcairn (Pitcairn PRO) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 332 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
Transistors | 1,950 million | vs | 2,800 million |
Shaders | 336 | vs | 1024 |
Compute Units | 7 | vs | 16 |
Core clock | 675 MHz | vs | 900 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 460 | | Radeon R7 265 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 460 | | Radeon R7 265 | |
---|
TDP | 160 watts | vs | 150 watts |
Release Date | 12 Jul 2010 | vs | 13 Feb 2014 |
GeForce GTX 460
9.45 GP/s
Radeon R7 265
29.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
37.80 GT/s
Radeon R7 265
59.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
115.00 GB/s
Radeon R7 265
179.20 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
907.20 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 265
1894.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460
3530
Radeon R7 265
6900
Points (higher is better)