GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs Radeon R7 265
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460 X2 |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 265 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 460 X2 | | Radeon R7 265 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1) | vs | Pitcairn (Pitcairn PRO) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 332 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,950 million | vs | 2,800 million |
| Shaders | 336 | vs | 1024 |
| Compute Units | 7 | vs | 16 |
| Core clock | 701 MHz | vs | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 460 X2 | | Radeon R7 265 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit x2 | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 460 X2 | | Radeon R7 265 | |
|---|
| TDP | 160 watts | vs | 150 watts |
| Release Date | 11 Mar 2011 | vs | 13 Feb 2014 |
GeForce GTX 460 X2
19.62 GP/s
Radeon R7 265
29.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460 X2
78.60 GT/s
Radeon R7 265
59.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460 X2
230.00 GB/s
Radeon R7 265
179.20 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 460 X2
1883.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 265
1894.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better