GeForce GTX 555 OEM vs GeForce GT 630

GeForce GTX 555 OEM
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 14 May 2011
GeForce GTX 555 OEM
GeForce GT 630
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 15 May 2012
GeForce GT 630

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630

85 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 555 OEM .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

GeForce GTX 555 OEM

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GTX 555 OEMGeForce GT 630
GPU NameGF114 ()vsGF108 (GF108-400-A1)
Fab Process40 nmvs40 nm
Die Size332 mm²vs116 mm²
Transistors1,950 millionvs585 million
Shaders288vs96
Compute Units6vs2
Core clock736 MHzvs810 MHz
ROPs24vs4
TMUs48vs16

Memory Configuration

GeForce GTX 555 OEMGeForce GT 630
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Bus Width192 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed957 MHz
3828 MHz effective
vs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 555 OEMGeForce GT 630
TDP150 wattsvs65 watts
Release Date14 May 2011vs15 May 2012

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 555 OEM
    8.83 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 630
    3.24 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 555 OEM
    35.30 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 630
    13.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 555 OEM
    91.90 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 630
    28.80 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 555 OEM
    847.90 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 630
    311.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better