GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
Around 191% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand |
150 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | | Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand | |
---|
GPU Name | GF110 (GF110-270-A1) | vs | Turks (Turks PRO) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 520 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
Transistors | 3,000 million | vs | 716 million |
Shaders | 448 | vs | 480 |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 732 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
ROPs | 40 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | | Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 320 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 950 MHz
3800 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1280 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | | Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand | |
---|
TDP | 210 watts | vs | 60 watts |
Release Date | 29 Nov 2011 | vs | 23 Jul 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)