GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand |
| 40 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Around 82% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
The GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | | GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF114 (GF114-400-A1) | vs | GK104 (GK104-200-KD-A2) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 332 mm² | vs | 294 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,950 million | vs | 3,540 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 1152 |
| Compute Units | 8 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 823 MHz | vs | 823 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | vs | 96 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | | GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1002 MHz
4008 MHz effective | vs | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | | GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand | |
|---|
| TDP | 170 watts | vs | 130 watts |
| Release Date | 8 Mar 2011 | vs | 25 Aug 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)