GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GT 730

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 25 Jan 2011
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GT 730
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 18 Jun 2014
GeForce GT 730

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 730

121 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 560 Ti .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GT 730
GPU NameGF114 (GF114-400-A1)vsGF108 (GF108-400-A1)
Fab Process40 nmvs40 nm
Die Size332 mm²vs116 mm²
Transistors1,950 millionvs585 million
Shaders384vs96
Compute Units8vs2
Core clock823 MHzvs700 MHz
ROPs32vs4
TMUs64vs16

Memory Configuration

GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GT 730
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Bus Width256 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed1002 MHz
4008 MHz effective
vs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GT 730
TDP170 wattsvs49 watts
Release Date25 Jan 2011vs18 Jun 2014

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 560 Ti
    13.20 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 730
    2.80 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 560 Ti
    52.70 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 730
    11.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 560 Ti
    128.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 730
    28.80 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 560 Ti
    1263.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 730
    268.80 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better