GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon R9 255 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 650 |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 255 OEM |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 650 | | Radeon R9 255 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK106 () | vs | Cape Verde (Cape Verde PRX) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 221 mm² | vs | 123 mm² |
| Transistors | 2,540 million | vs | 1,500 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 512 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 1058 MHz | vs | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 650 | | Radeon R9 255 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective | vs | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 650 | | Radeon R9 255 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 65 watts |
| Release Date | 27 Nov 2013 | vs | 21 Dec 2013 |
GeForce GTX 650
8.46 GP/s
Radeon R9 255 OEM
14.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 650
33.90 GT/s
Radeon R9 255 OEM
28.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 650
80.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 255 OEM
73.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 650
812.50 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 255 OEM
921.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better