GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs Radeon R7 260X
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
Around 37% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 260X |
55 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand . |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | | Radeon R7 260X | |
---|
GPU Name | GK104 (GK104-325-A2) | vs | Bonaire (Bonaire XTX) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 294 mm² | vs | 160 mm² |
Transistors | 3,540 million | vs | 2,080 million |
Shaders | 1344 | vs | 896 |
Compute Units | 7 | vs | 14 |
Core clock | 915 MHz | vs | 1100 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 112 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | | Radeon R7 260X | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective | vs | 1625 MHz
6500 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | | Radeon R7 260X | |
---|
TDP | 170 watts | vs | 115 watts |
Release Date | 25 Aug 2013 | vs | 8 Oct 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)