GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs Radeon R7 370
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 370 |
| 60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | | Radeon R7 370 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK104 (GK104-325-A2) | vs | Trinidad (Trinidad PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 294 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | vs | 2,800 million |
| Shaders | 1344 | vs | 1024 |
| Compute Units | 7 | vs | 16 |
| Core clock | 915 MHz | vs | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | | Radeon R7 370 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective | vs | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | | Radeon R7 370 | |
|---|
| TDP | 170 watts | vs | 110 watts |
| Release Date | 25 Aug 2013 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)