GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 6350
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6350 |
| 151 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 760 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 760
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760 | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK104 (GK104-225-A2) | vs | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 294 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 1152 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 980 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 96 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760 | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 760 | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| TDP | 170 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 25 Jun 2013 | vs | 7 Feb 2011 |
GeForce GTX 760
23.50 GP/s
Radeon HD 6350
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 760
94.10 GT/s
Radeon HD 6350
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 760
192.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 6350
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 760
2258.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6350
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better