GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs GeForce GT 240
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 950 OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 240 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 950 OEM | | GeForce GT 240 | |
---|
GPU Name | GM206 (GM206 950 OEM) | vs | GT215 (GT215-450-A2) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 228 mm² | vs | 144 mm² |
Transistors | 2,940 million | vs | 727 million |
Shaders | 1024 | vs | 96 |
Compute Units | 8 | vs | 4 |
Core clock | 924 MHz | vs | 550 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 64 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 950 OEM | | GeForce GT 240 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1253 MHz
5012 MHz effective | vs | 850 MHz
3400 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 950 OEM | | GeForce GT 240 | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 69 watts |
Release Date | 14 May 2016 | vs | 17 Nov 2009 |
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
29.57 GP/s
GeForce GT 240
4.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
59.10 GT/s
GeForce GT 240
17.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
80.20 GB/s
GeForce GT 240
54.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
1892.40 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 240
257.30 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better