GeForce GTX 960M vs GeForce 510 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 960M |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 510 OEM |
| 50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 960M . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 960M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 960M | | GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GM107 (N16P-GX-A1) | vs | GF119 () |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 148 mm² | vs | 79 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,870 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 640 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 5 | vs | 1 |
| Core clock | 1097 MHz | vs | 523 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 40 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 960M | | GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1253 MHz
5012 MHz effective | vs | 898 MHz
1796 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 960M | | GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 25 watts |
| Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | vs | 29 Sep 2011 |
GeForce GTX 960M
17.55 GP/s
GeForce 510 OEM
1.05 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 960M
43.90 GT/s
GeForce 510 OEM
4.18 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 960M
80.20 GB/s
GeForce 510 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 960M
1404.20 GFLOPs
GeForce 510 OEM
100.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better