GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2050 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
55 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 2050 . |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2050
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | TU107 (TU107) | vs | GK106 () |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 221 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 2,540 million |
Shaders | 896 | vs | 576 |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 3 |
Core clock | 1515 MHz | vs | 824 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 120 watts | vs | 65 watts |
Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 22 Apr 2013 |
GeForce RTX 2050
54.24 GP/s
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
9.89 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
94.92 GT/s
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
39.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
224.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
3037.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
949.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better