GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon R7 260X
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2050 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 260X |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2050
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 (TU107) | vs | Bonaire (Bonaire XTX) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 160 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 2,080 million |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 896 |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 14 |
| Core clock | 1515 MHz | vs | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 1625 MHz
6500 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|
| TDP | 120 watts | vs | 115 watts |
| Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 8 Oct 2013 |
GeForce RTX 2050
54.24 GP/s
Radeon R7 260X
17.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
94.92 GT/s
Radeon R7 260X
61.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
224.00 GB/s
Radeon R7 260X
104.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
3037.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 260X
1971.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better