GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (GP104)
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (GP104) |
| 55 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 2070 Super . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (GP104) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU104 (TU104-410-A1) | vs | GP104 (GP104-140-A1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 16 nm |
| Die Size | 545 mm² | vs | 314 mm² |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | vs | 7,200 million |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 1152 |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 9 |
| Core clock | 1605 MHz | vs | 1506 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | vs | 72 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (GP104) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 2002 MHz
8008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (GP104) | |
|---|
| TDP | 175 watts | vs | 120 watts |
| Release Date | 9 Jul 2019 | vs | 25 Dec 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better