GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition |
| 130 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 2070 Super . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU104 (TU104-410-A1) | vs | RV630 () |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 545 mm² | vs | 153 mm² |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | vs | 390 million |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 120 |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 1605 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 160 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 256 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 175 watts | vs | 45 watts |
| Release Date | 9 Jul 2019 | vs | 21 Feb 2008 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better