GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Memory: 6144Mb GDDR6DESKTOP
Release date: UNRELEASED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080
Memory: 8192Mb GDDR5XDESKTOP
Release date: 27 May 2016
GeForce GTX 1080

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080

Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce RTX 3050 TiGeForce GTX 1080
GPU NameGA106 (GA106-200-A1)vsGP104 (GP104-400-A1)
Fab Process8 nmvs16 nm
Die Size300 mm²vs314 mm²
Transistors13,250 millionvs7,200 million
Shaders3584vs2560
Compute Units28vs20
Core clock1350 MHzvs1607 MHz
ROPs64vs64
TMUs112vs160

Memory Configuration

GeForce RTX 3050 TiGeForce GTX 1080
Memory TypeGDDR6vsGDDR5X
Bus Width192 bitvs256 bit
Memory Speed1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective
vs1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective
Memory Size6144 Mbvs8192 Mb

Additional details

GeForce RTX 3050 TiGeForce GTX 1080
TDP150 wattsvs180 watts
Release DateUNRELEASEDvs27 May 2016

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
    108.00 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 1080
    102.80 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
    188.90 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 1080
    257.10 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
    336.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 1080
    320.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
    12090.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 1080
    8228.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better