GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|
GPU Name | GA106 (GA106-200-A1) | vs | TU116 (TU116-300-A1) |
Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 12 nm |
Die Size | 300 mm² | vs | 284 mm² |
Transistors | 13,250 million | vs | 6,600 million |
Shaders | 3584 | vs | 1408 |
Compute Units | 28 | vs | 22 |
Core clock | 1350 MHz | vs | 1530 MHz |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 48 |
TMUs | 112 | vs | 88 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR6 |
Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 192 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective | vs | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 6144 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|
TDP | 150 watts | vs | 125 watts |
Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 29 Oct 2019 |
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
108.00 GP/s
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
85.68 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
188.90 GT/s
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
157.10 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
336.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
336.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
12090.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5020.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better