GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6800
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
100 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX 6800 . |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6800 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Infinity Cache allows to deliver up to 3.25x the effective memory bandwidth |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 6800
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | | Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|
GPU Name | GA106 (GA106-200-A1) | vs | Navi 21 (Navi 21 XL) |
Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 7 nm |
Die Size | 300 mm² | vs | 536 mm² |
Transistors | 13,250 million | vs | 26,800 million |
Shaders | 3584 | vs | 3840 |
Compute Units | 28 | vs | 60 |
Core clock | 1350 MHz | vs | 1700 MHz |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 96 |
TMUs | 112 | vs | 240 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | | Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR6 |
Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective | vs | 2000 MHz
16 Gbps effective |
Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 16384 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | | Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|
TDP | 150 watts | vs | 250 watts |
Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 28 Oct 2020 |
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
108.00 GP/s
Radeon RX 6800
202.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
188.90 GT/s
Radeon RX 6800
505.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
336.00 GB/s
Radeon RX 6800
512.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
12090.00 GFLOPs
Radeon RX 6800
16170.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better