GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
Memory: 16384Mb GDDR6XDESKTOP
Release date: UNRELEASED
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Memory: 16384Mb GDDR6DESKTOP
Release date: UNRELEASED
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

90 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB .
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GBGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU NameGA104 (GA104-401-A1)vsGA104 ()
Fab Process8 nmvs8 nm
Die Size392 mm²vs392 mm²
Transistors17,400 millionvs17,400 million
Shaders6144vs6144
Tensor Cores192vsnone
Raytracing Cores48vsnone
Compute Units48vs48
Core clock1575 MHzvs1500 MHz
ROPs96vs96
TMUs192vs192

Memory Configuration

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GBGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Memory TypeGDDR6XvsGDDR6
Bus Width256 bitvs256 bit
Memory Speed1188 MHz
19 Gbps effective
vs1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective
Memory Size16384 Mbvs16384 Mb

Additional details

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GBGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
TDP290 wattsvs200 watts
Release DateUNRELEASEDvsUNRELEASED

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
    169.90 GP/s
  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
    165.60 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
    339.80 GT/s
  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
    331.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
    608.30 GB/s
  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
    448.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
    21750.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
    21200.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better