GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce GTX 1650
Summary
GeForce RTX 3070
395%
GeForce GTX 1650
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3070 |
295% higher gaming performance. |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (10 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3070 | | GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|
GPU Name | GA104 (GA104-300-A1) | vs | TU107 () |
Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 12 nm |
Die Size | 392 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
Transistors | 17,400 million | vs | unknown |
Shaders | 5888 | vs | 896 |
Compute Units | 46 | vs | 14 |
Core clock | 1500 MHz | vs | 1485 MHz |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 184 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3070 | | GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective | vs | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3070 | | GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|
TDP | 220 watts | vs | 0 watts |
Release Date | 1 Sep 2020 | vs | 30 Apr 2019 |
GeForce RTX 3070
110.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 1650
53.28 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3070
317.40 GT/s
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3070
448.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3070
20310.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3070
120
GeForce GTX 1650
55
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3070
106
GeForce GTX 1650
22
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce RTX 3070
161
GeForce GTX 1650
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3070
228
GeForce GTX 1650
54
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce RTX 3070
186
GeForce GTX 1650
51
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3070
117
GeForce GTX 1650
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3070
84
GeForce GTX 1650
17
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce RTX 3070
122
GeForce GTX 1650
27
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3070
168
GeForce GTX 1650
39
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce RTX 3070
140
GeForce GTX 1650
35
FPS (higher is better)