GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Summary
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
358%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
| 258% higher gaming performance. |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
| 250 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (26 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GA102 (GA102-225-A1) | vs | TU116 () |
| Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 12 nm |
| Die Size | 628 mm² | vs | 284 mm² |
| Transistors | 28,300 million | vs | 6,600 million |
| Shaders | 10240 | vs | 1280 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | vs | none |
| Raytracing Cores | 80 | vs | none |
| Compute Units | 80 | vs | 20 |
| Core clock | 1365 MHz | vs | 1530 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 320 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | vs | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1188 MHz
19 Gbps effective | vs | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|
| TDP | 350 watts | vs | 100 watts |
| Release Date | 31 May 2021 | vs | 22 Nov 2019 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
186.50 GP/s
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
55.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
532.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
138.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
912.40 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
34100.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
174
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
70
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
261
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
85
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
292
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
78
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
59
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
74
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
249
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
104
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
128
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
39
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
223
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
66
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
288
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
79
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
173
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
53
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
226
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
211
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
60
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
137
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
54
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
211
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
66
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
109
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
31
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
161
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
249
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
57
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
112
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
143
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
33
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
139
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
78
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
17
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
99
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
77
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
16
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
96
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
18
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
153
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
32
FPS (higher is better)