GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs TITAN V
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider TITAN V |
200 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti . |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute. |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | | TITAN V | |
---|
GPU Name | GA102 (GA102-350-A1) | vs | GV100 (GV100-400-A1) |
Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 12 nm |
Die Size | 628 mm² | vs | 815 mm² |
Transistors | 28,300 million | vs | 21,100 million |
Shaders | 10752 | vs | 5120 |
Tensor Cores | 336 | vs | none |
Raytracing Cores | 84 | vs | none |
Compute Units | 84 | vs | 80 |
Core clock | 1560 MHz | vs | 1200 MHz |
ROPs | 112 | vs | 96 |
TMUs | 336 | vs | 320 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | | TITAN V | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6X | vs | HBM2 |
Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 3072 bit |
Memory Speed | 1313 MHz
21 Gbps effective | vs | 850 MHz
1700 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 24576 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | | TITAN V | |
---|
TDP | 450 watts | vs | 250 watts |
Release Date | 27 Jan 2022 | vs | 7 Dec 2017 |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
208.30 GP/s
TITAN V
139.70 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
625.00 GT/s
TITAN V
465.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
1008.00 GB/s
TITAN V
652.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
40000.00 GFLOPs
TITAN V
14899.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better