HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) vs GeForce GT 630
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 630
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | GeForce GT 630 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Sandy Bridge GT1 () | vs | GF108 (GF108-400-A1) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 149 mm² | vs | 116 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 585 million |
| Shaders | 6 | vs | 96 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 850 MHz | vs | 810 MHz |
| ROPs | 1 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 1 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | GeForce GT 630 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | GeForce GT 630 | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 65 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Jan 2011 | vs | 15 May 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better