HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) vs Radeon R7 350 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 350 OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 350 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon R7 350 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | Sandy Bridge GT1 () | vs | Oland (Oland XT) |
Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 149 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
Transistors | 189 million | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 6 | vs | 384 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 850 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 1 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 1 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon R7 350 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon R7 350 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 65 watts |
Release Date | 5 Jan 2011 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better