HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) vs Radeon HD 6570
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6570 |
| Around 375% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6570
The Radeon HD 6570 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Ivy Bridge GT1 () | vs | Turks (Turks PRO) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 118 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 6 | vs | 480 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 1 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 1 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 2500 (Ivy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 60 watts |
| Release Date | 1 Apr 2012 | vs | 19 Apr 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)