HD Graphics 3000 Mobile (Sandy Bridge GT2) vs HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1)
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 3000 Mobile (Sandy Bridge GT2) |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
HWBench recommends HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 3000 Mobile (Sandy Bridge GT2) | | HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Sandy Bridge GT2 () | vs | Sandy Bridge GT1 () |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
| Die Size | 216 mm² | vs | 149 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 189 million |
| Shaders | 12 | vs | 6 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 850 MHz |
| ROPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| TMUs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 3000 Mobile (Sandy Bridge GT2) | | HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 3000 Mobile (Sandy Bridge GT2) | | HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 0 watts |
| Release Date | 1 Feb 2011 | vs | 5 Jan 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better