HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) vs Radeon HD 6450 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6450 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | | Radeon HD 6450 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Haswell GT2 () | vs | Caicos (Junbonator) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 370 million |
| Shaders | 20 | vs | 160 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 350 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 4 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | | Radeon HD 6450 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 533 MHz
1066 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | | Radeon HD 6450 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 20 watts | vs | 18 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Sep 2013 | vs | 7 Feb 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)