HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) vs Radeon R7 240
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 240 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 240
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | | Radeon R7 240 | |
---|
GPU Name | Haswell GT2 () | vs | Oland (Oland PRO) |
Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
Transistors | 392 million | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 20 | vs | 320 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 5 |
Core clock | 350 MHz | vs | 730 MHz |
ROPs | 2 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 4 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | | Radeon R7 240 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | | Radeon R7 240 | |
---|
TDP | 20 watts | vs | 30 watts |
Release Date | 3 Sep 2013 | vs | 8 Oct 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better