HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) vs GeForce GTX 260 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) |
| 137 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 OEM . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) | | GeForce GTX 260 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Haswell GT2 () | vs | GT200B (G200-103-B2) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 20 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 400 MHz | vs | 518 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 4 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) | | GeForce GTX 260 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1008 MHz
2016 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1792 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) | | GeForce GTX 260 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 182 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 8 Dec 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better