HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) vs GeForce 310 OEM

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
GeForce 310 OEM
Memory: 512Mb DDR2DESKTOP
Release date: 27 Nov 2009
GeForce 310 OEM

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce 310 OEM

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)GeForce 310 OEM
GPU NameSkylake GT1 ()vsGT218 (GT218-300-A2)
Fab Process14 nmvs40 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs57 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs260 million
Shaders96vs16
Compute Units0vs2
Core clock300 MHzvs589 MHz
ROPs3vs4
TMUs12vs8

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)GeForce 310 OEM
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsDDR2
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs64 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs333 MHz
666 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)GeForce 310 OEM
TDP15 wattsvs31 watts
Release Date1 Sep 2015vs27 Nov 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s
  • GeForce 310 OEM
    2.36 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s
  • GeForce 310 OEM
    4.71 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce 310 OEM
    5.33 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs
  • GeForce 310 OEM
    44.86 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better