HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) vs Radeon HD 6250

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Radeon HD 6250
Memory: 512Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 31 Jan 2011
Radeon HD 6250

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6250

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Radeon HD 6250

HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6250

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon HD 6250
GPU NameSkylake GT1 ()vsCedar (Cedar PRO)
Fab Process14 nmvs40 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs59 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs292 million
Shaders96vs80
Compute Units0vs2
Core clock300 MHzvs650 MHz
ROPs3vs4
TMUs12vs8

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon HD 6250
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs64 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs500 MHz
1000 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon HD 6250
TDP15 wattsvs19 watts
Release Date1 Sep 2015vs31 Jan 2011

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s
  • Radeon HD 6250
    2.60 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s
  • Radeon HD 6250
    5.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon HD 6250
    8.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs
  • Radeon HD 6250
    104.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better